by: Faydra L. Shapiro, Galilee Center for Studies in Jewish–Christian Relations
Dr. Faydra Shapiro is a specialist in contemporary Jewish–Christian relations, with a focus on evangelical Christian–Jewish relations, and has published and presented extensively on the topic of Christian Zionism and evangelical Christian support for Israel. In addition to being a scholar, teacher and author, Dr. Shapiro is a wife and mother, and a trusted friend and supporter of Bridges for Peace. We are pleased to present her article in its entirety.
It has been a busy year in Jewish–Christian relations, celebrating the 50th anniversary of the truly ground-breaking document, Nostra Aetate, that emerged out of the Second Vatican Council.
There are many interesting developments in the most recent document of the Pontifical Commission of Relations with the Jews. There are many exciting aspects of this new, and very long (over 10,000 words) statement. “The Gifts and Calling of God are Irrevocable” is a most welcome unpacking of the very revolutionary Vatican II Nostra Aetate, a document whose very elegance and density allowed a multiplicity of possible readings. Now, fifty years later, many important attitudes are spelled out with great clarity (inasmuch as that’s possible in theological musings) in order to avoid such misreadings.
To my mind, the most important points that Jewish readers need to know about the new statement produced by the Commission are the following:
Perhaps more challenging for Jewish onlookers, are the following:
“But wait”—one might reasonably object—“didn’t we read all over the internet that the Church had renounced missionizing the Jews?” Reasonable indeed, seeing as how major outlets from the New York Times to the Washington Post, Haaretz to the Jerusalem Post, all trumpeted clear headlines that proclaimed in one way or another that Catholics were not to engage in mission to the Jews.
The document in fact does not say this. While there is—tachlis—a rejection of any Church office or Church-supported office dedicated to evangelizing the Jews (“specific, institutional mission”), Christians are still enjoined to proclaim their faith in Jesus Christ both in word and deed, to all, including Jews. And there remains, in this document, a very clear insistence that there is only one way to salvation: through Jesus Christ.
This is by no means the first time a Christian document has been similarly wishfully misread by Jewish readers. In 1998 MK Nissim Zvili removed his support from a new anti-missionary bill in exchange for the signing of a public statement by a coalition of Christian organizations in Israel [Editor’s note: the press called it a signed statement but actually it was just a press release]. The statement included an agreement to “not engage in activities, which have as their intention to alienate them [Jews] from their tradition and community.” The Jewish press in Israel excitedly proclaimed that this marked the end of proselytizing in Israel with headlines that included “No Missionary Activity in the Holy Land.”
Yet some Christians in Israel were amazed to learn that this statement had been interpreted by the Jewish community as agreement to refrain from sharing the gospel with Jews in Israel. As a result one of the main authors of the original statement rushed to present a clarification for the press that expressed his conviction that Jews who come to faith in Jesus Christ—Messianic Jews—cannot be considered alienated from Jewish community or constituting a threat to the Jewish people. The statement also clarified that proclaiming the gospel is in fact “our right and duty,” albeit one that needs to be carried out with “standards or morality, sensitivity and respect of other faiths.”
These accidental on purpose misreadings of Christians’ statements are a part of Jewish life. We so badly want it to be true, and have such a difficult time understanding why it is not, that we rush to make it so by misreading. It is quite understandable why Jews are deeply concerned with the issue of Christian mission. It is impossible for us to reconcile statements that value our people and our religion with statements that permit or encourage practices that—if successful—will signal the end of our people and our religion.
Yet Christianity is a universal religion, in which mission—conceived in different ways, no doubt—is a central component. A “mitzvah,” if you will. We can reasonably ask and even expect Christians to undertake mission to the Jews in certain ways, be that with sensitivity, through lifestyle example, with respect, without promise of reward, whatever. But we cannot reasonably ask or expect Christians to renounce a concept of mission to all peoples, one that is intimately connected to the orthodox belief in Jesus Christ as the savior of all. Because that would be asking Christians to be something other than who they are. We as Jews should be extremely wary of doing so, holding fast as we do to our own beliefs and practices.
A basic principle of good Jewish–Christian relations needs to be respectful acceptance of the others’ tradition and self-understanding, albeit with the freedom to articulate how that tradition might cause real or perceived harm. Jews don’t need Christians to stop being Christians. It is time for us Jews to grow up a little: to be ready to be in profound but respectful disagreement with Christians, rather than seeking to turn Christians into some image of what we want them to be. We would ask for no less for ourselves.
The writer is the Director for the Galilee Center for Studies in Jewish-Christian Relations (www.csjcr.com) at The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College. She can be contacted at email@example.com
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. All other materials are property of Bridges for Peace. Copyright © 2023.
Website Site Design by J-Town Internet Services Ltd. - Based in Jerusalem and Serving the World.