by: Ben-Dror Yemini
Wednesday, 16 October 2019 | The Kurds weren’t in Normandy on D-Day, as US President Donald Trump argued when explaining why he had abandoned them, but neither was Israel.
In those days there was no Kurdish state, and there still isn’t. There wasn’t even an autonomy with a military force—but now there is.
During the six years of fighting between the Kurds and Islamist factions in Syria, especially the Islamic State, the Americans assisted the Kurds with intelligence and air strikes.
The Kurds carried most of the burden. They fought on the ground and suffered 11,000 casualties. The Kurds did the dirty work for themselves, but also for the free world. They established an autonomy called Rojava, which officially calls itself the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (NES).
Given the powers operating in the area, this autonomy is—or was should we say, a bit peculiar. It was characterized mainly by the principles of religious freedom, equality for women, direct democracy and possibly even anti-capitalism. The latter principle did not interfere with cooperation with the United States.
In any case, during the past year there have been only 1,000 American soldiers on Syrian soil. They weren’t supposed to fight. Their presence in the region was supposed to restrain President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s expansionist aspirations.
The Kurds have a grim history. Under the Syrian Mandate, which was implemented in 1921, the country was divided into six different entities, each under a separate banner.
Two of them were Sunni (Damascus and Aleppo), one Druze (Jabal Druze State), one Alawite (the Alawite State in the Latakia region), Alexandretta (which the Turks annexed and renamed Iskenderun) and Lebanon (which became independent). But the Kurds were left out in the cold.
The situation of the Kurds worsened under Syrian rule. They have suffered decades of systematic and institutional discrimination as part of the attempts to Arabize the region.
The use of the Kurdish language was banned, 120,000 Kurds were stripped off their citizenship, local authorities seized massive swathes of Kurdish land and handed it over to Arab hands and much more.
The autonomy that emerged in northern Syria could have been partial compensation for an historical injustice.
The demand for Kurdish independence also occasionally arises in Israel. There are those who compare them to the Palestinians but this comparison is ludicrous.
The Kurds of Rojava are not asking for independence, they are not demanding the dissolution of Syria and they declare that they want to live under the Syrian flag.
The Palestinians, unlike the Kurds, have repeatedly been offered proposals for independence and the establishment of a separate state, but they declined time and time again. The Kurds never received such an offer.
Have the Kurds ever threatened to eradicate Syria, Iraq or Turkey? Have they ever launched rockets at population centers? Are their educational systems laden with jihadist racist propaganda?
The invasion is intended, among other things, to create a “safe zone” in which Turkey could settle Syrian refugees who fled due to the civil war raging in the country, but in the meantime, it also creates a new wave of hundreds of thousands of refugees. Where exactly will they run to?
We live in a world where atrocities against Muslims are firmly condemned—they were slaughtered in Darfur, they faced ethnic cleansing and massacres in Myanmar, they are locked up in re-education camps in China—these were always condemned with the support of the Arab and Muslim world.
But now when it is the Kurds, again the Kurds, who are facing a new wave of war crimes, the world keeps silent.
Posted on October 16, 2019
Photo Credit: Kurdishstruggle/flickr.com
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. All other materials are property of Bridges for Peace. Copyright © 2019.
Website Site Design by J-Town Internet Services Ltd. - Based in Jerusalem and Serving the World.