“The Beirut airport was turned into one of Hizbullah’s security quarters,” an anonymous member of Lebanese Prime Minister Sa’ad A-Din Al-Hariri March 14 Alliance told the Arab daily A-Sharq Al-Awsat. “This dangerously revealed airport security.”
“Seeing the airport incident, it is clear that Hizbullah has decided to attack the regime,” Ghazi Youssef, a parliament member in Hariri’s Al-Mustaqbal (Movement of the Future) bloc told The Media Line. “Hizbullah believes this is part of the democratic game, but what was done was a breach of the law. There are limits to freedom of expression.”
Mohammad Shatah, a former Lebanese minister, was less diplomatic. “The airport scene was surreal. Lebanese could have never seen such a sight in any other country in the world.” But clearly more than airport security is now at stake in Lebanon. Before leaving for Paris on September 12, Sayyed called Prime Minster Sa'ad Al-Hariri a liar and urged the Lebanese to topple his government. Upon his return to Beirut, again Sayyed did not mince his words. This time, he attacked State Prosecutor Sa’id Mirza, who called him in for questioning following his threatening statements.
“Mirza is supposed to be a public prosecutor—i.e. neutral—but considering these lawsuits, he became my personal adversary,” Lebanon’s Daily Star quoted Sayyed as saying. The issue of “false witnesses” has become a main point of contention for Sayyed and his supporters in Hizbullah. The term refers to Lebanese legal and security officials who testified before the [United Nation-established] Special Tribunal for Lebanon, which is investigating the assassination of Rafiq Al-Hariri.
Prime Minister Sa’ad Hariri recently rescinded his accusation of Syria as primarily responsible for his father’s assassination in an interview with the Arab daily A-Sharq Al-Awsat, acknowledging the existence of false witnesses. However, on Monday [September 27], Hariri reiterated his support for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, defying Hizbullah’s demand that Lebanon officially accuse Israel of the murder.
Professor Eugène Sensenig-Dabbous, chairman of the Political Science department at Lebanon’s Notre-Dame University, said that Hariri’s overture towards Syria was implicitly implicating Hizbullah. “If Syria isn’t involved in the assassination, who is?” he rhetorically asked in an interview with The Media Line. “It’s looking more and more like Hizbullah was involved in the assassinations that took place in 2005.”
Sensenig-Dabbous predicted a re-alignment of powers, with Hariri’s March 14 Alliance drawing closer to Syria, leaving Hizbullah isolated with Iran. “I don’t know if a partnership with Michel Aoun’s Free Patriotic Movement [in Lebanon] and Iran will be enough for Hizbullah,” Sensenig-Dabbous said.
Samir Al-Sa’adawi, a Beirut-based journalist at the Arab daily Al-Hayyat, said that tensions in Lebanon would likely intensify rather than calm down. “The situation is tense, and is only escalating,” he told The Media Line. “I don’t know if the regional players, Syria and Saudi Arabia, can stop the escalation—if not, we’re facing more trouble.”
Posted on October 5, 2010
Source: (By David E. Miller, The Media Line, October 3, 2010)
Photo Credit: en.wikipedia.org
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. All other materials are property of Bridges for Peace. Copyright © 2022.
Website Site Design by J-Town Internet Services Ltd. - Based in Jerusalem and Serving the World.